Brother 310 "Multiplier" Desktop Calculator
Image Courtesy of Serge Devidts, Calcuseum
The Brother 310 is a peculiar calculator - it does not have divison capability.
The story behind this, and a number of other calculators that lacked division capability, lies in the development of
a three-chip MOS LSI "multiplier" calculator chipset developed by Mitsubishi. It's not known if this chipset was
purposefully developed lacking division, or perhaps had a bug in the implementation that caused division results to be incorrect
that was found after a large batch of the chips had alreay been produced. However, there are some clues that perhaps
the chipset was purposefully produced to omit division. One clue is the lack of a decimal point key on the keyboard.
The lack of a decimal point key would indicate that perhaps division was not built-in to the chipset, because division
operations have significantly less usefulness unless the ability to process fractional numbers is present. It is also a
possibility that if the chipset indeed had a bug, that the specifications for the chipset simply did not mention the
availability of input for a decimal point key. Whether by design, or an accident, this chipset did sell to Japanese
calculator makers Brother and Denon. Denon's machine was the
Brother also sold the 310 as an OEM product to Remington, who marketed the machine as the
The three Mitsubishi chips, part numbers MA8111, MA8112, and MA8113, were packaged in ceramic flat-pack packaging,
with a rectangular package having long gold leads extending out from both long edges of the package. In the Denon
calculator, the "higher-end" of these "no divide" calculators, the chips were retained in complex sockets that supported and
connected the packages by the leads. Less-expensive versions, like the Brother 310 and the Remington E3 (which was identical
to the Brother 310 other than the name badge and model/serial number tag) had the chips soldered directly to the circuit board.
With technology advancing so quickly in these times, the notion of selling a "three-function" electronic calculator that could
not divide was not a great strategy. With prices for full four-function electronic calculators in free-fall, why would anyone
buy a calculator that could not handle fractional numbers, and didn't have the ability to do division, when for literally
just a few dollars more, they could buy a full four-function calculator? It seems like the idea behind these machines
was more of a marketing gimmick rather than having any real merit. Whatever reason drove the marketing of these rather handicapped
chips and calculators, it likely will remain shrouded in the mists of time.